Why are you here and why am I doing this?

Why are you here and why am I doing this?

If you're like me, THIS is as close to crime as you want to get.

You want to maintain a safe distance and delve into it when it's convenient for you; not when some lunatic knocks on your door in the middle of the night, runs you off the road or approaches you in a parking lot.

Maybe you are a Murderino?

I'm someone who resolves every New Year's Eve to NOT be the victim of a crime.

Some of the crimes I'll describe here aren't horrific or even result in death, but they're still situations to be avoided. Who wants the drama or the paperwork associated with a non-violent crime? Not me.

I know I'm not the only one who's interested in reading about crime & criminals. I hope to use this blog to share that interest with others.

My process is to find something in an old newspaper, news broadcast or my own memory that grabs my attention and delve deep. I research the cases and people using newspaper and magazine archives, genealogy sites plus court or prison documents (when I can afford them). Lately the way I write the stories has changed. I'm starting to show the effort I've made to track down specific details. I also seem to be posting less frequently. This can be attributed to the fact that I'm now concerned with the As Close to Crime YouTube channel as well as my habit of falling deeper and deeper into rabbit holes with each new entry. I'd rather have quality than quantity, so I've come to terms with the lessening output.

I try not rely too heavily on other websites or books but I credit people when it's appropriate. In fact, if my main source of information is someone else's book, I'll just recommend the book. This was the case with "The Bobbed Haired Bandit."

Don't expect too many Top 10 lists from me. I instead prefer to select the more obscure crimes that some visitors to this blog have either never heard of or haven't thought about in awhile.

I also like to give attention to not just those who break the law but those who uphold the law. So you can expect to see some of that here.

There's a companion YouTube Channel for this blog, called As Close to Crime, where I occasionally post clips related to particular blog entries or just random clips concerning criminal activity. I'm never going to post an entire commercially available film.

Be sure to subscribe to the channel or this blog.

Search This Blog

Monday, April 30, 2018

A Series of Unfortunate Events


It was an accident but Arlene Francis still killed somebody.
 
On Sunday, May 26, 1963, Arlene Francis was driving herself back to Manhattan in her agent Martin Goodman's car after a few hours on Long Island. She'd come east earlier that day to discuss her appearance in a future production at the Mineola Playhouse but now she needed to get back to NYC in time for her weekly Sunday evening appearance on "What's My Line?"

(The Mineola Theatre is no longer in operation but I've indicated its location with a red dot on the Google map below and here's a photo.)

Mineola Playhouse, circa 1964
Arlene was traveling west on the Northern State Parkway and had been stuck in the right lane behind someone whose right blinker had been on for a very long time so she decided to pass him. Arlene accelerated and made her move to the left. Unfortunately, Arlene didn't realize that just ahead of her there had been a minor traffic accident, causing the car driven by Louis H. Van Dam, to skid into the divider. Arlene hit the brakes.

Google Map showing the location of the Mineola Playhouse and the approximate site of the accident.

The roads were slick and the car Arlene was driving skidded then jumped over the 18 inch dividing wall, into east bound traffic. She collided head-on into a car carrying 5 people. The passenger, Mrs. Rose Arcos, aged 34, was killed. The driver, her husband, Joseph Arcos, also 34 years-old, was in serious condition, having suffered injuries to his head, face, legs and arms. Their 9-year-old daughter Celeste received minor facial injuries. Two rear seat passengers, Anthony Catapano, aged 58, and his wife Lena, aged 52, suffered facial injuries and were transported to the hospital.




This 2016 Google Maps image will give you an idea of the road but not the weather conditions.

I'm not exactly sure where Arlene's car jumped the divider. She testified that she was near the New Hyde Park exit when she changed lanes but she didn't specify if it was before or after the exit ramp. This is the view as one travels west on the NSP and approaches the exit. This stretch of road is before the overpass that I believe the cars were moved to after the collision, although on the opposite side of the Parkway. Further on down the road, there is substantial vegetation atop the dividing wall that would impede a car's progress over the barrier. If she crossed over here, before the exit, the leap over the barrier is easier.

Arlene's own injuries were substantial but not life-threatening. She had broken ribs, a broken collarbone, assorted bruises, a head laceration and a concussion; she was hospitalized for 10 days. Kitty Carlisle stepped in to take Arlene's place on the "What's My Line?" panel that evening. Arlene wouldn't be back to work on "What's My Line?" until June 16, 1963 and when she did return she had her arm in a sling.

On July 23, 1963, a lawsuit for $1 million ($500,000 each), alleging negligence, was filed against Arlene and her agent on behalf of the Arcos family even though no criminal charges were brought. It was ruled a tragic accident. Arlene's lawyer argued that the first accident involving Mr. Van Dam caused Arlene to brake so suddenly.

On July 29, 1963 there was a hearing regarding the accident at the DMV. Testimony from both Arlene and Joseph Arcos, who had automatically had their licenses suspended, was vague as they were both suffering from partial amnesia regarding the events. 

On June 4, 1965, the Queens Supreme Court awarded the Arcos family $210,000. The breakdown was $162,500 for the death of Rose Arcos, $40,000 for Joseph's injuries and $7,500 for Celeste's injuries.

Mr. and Mrs. Catapano had filed a separate claim and but their suit was dismissed.


This was not the first time Arlene Francis had been sued in a wrongful death suit.
 
On June 23, 1960, shortly after 2 PM, Detroit native Alvin Rodecker was struck on the head and killed by an eight pound dumbbell that fell from Arlene and husband Martin Gabel's 8th floor apartment in the Ritz Towers Hotel on 57th Street in Manhattan. 

Alvin and his wife Katherine were visiting NYC for a few days to celebrate his 60th birthday. They had just emerged from the neighboring Le Pavillon Restaurant when the accident occurred.

The last thing Alvin said to his wife was about the meal. "Holy cow, that was expensive. But it was worth it. We're really celebrating."
Neither Arlene or Martin were even in Manhattan when the accident happened. They'd left the city three weeks prior and were staying in Mt. Kisco, NY while their apartment's air conditioning unit was being repaired. Arlene would be performing in summer stock in nearby Westport, CT.

The air conditioner had been taken out of the window and replaced by an ill-fitting screen that was propped in place by a pair of dumbbells belonging to the Gabel's son Peter. 

In the apartment that afternoon was the Gabel's private secretary Muriel Fleit and Effie Turner, a maid employed by the hotel. 
Muriel Fleit, Billy Rose Theatre Collection image
Effie wanted to clean the screen, so Muriel picked up one of the dumbbells making the removal of the screen possible. As the maid was taking the screen out of the window, the second hand weight rolled towards the opening. Effie grabbed for it but she wasn't quick enough. 

The 8 pound dumbbell fell and hit Alvin directly on the head, his skull was fractured and he died the next day.

Hearing of the tragedy, the Gabels rushed right back to Manhattan.

There were no criminal charges brought against the Gabels but a lawsuit on behalf of the grieving widow was filed. Mrs. Rodecker's attorney was asking for $500,000 but she was awarded $185,000. The Gabels' insurance covered $175,000 and the hotel paid $10,000.



I've uploaded a video clip from the January 13, 1957 episode of What's My Line? to the As Close To Crime YouTube channel. Why? Because the among Mystery Guests that Sunday evening were the personal secretaries of Arlene Franics, Dorothy Kilgallen and Bennett Cerf. Those women were  Muriel Fleit, Myrtle Verne and Mary Barber. This would have been 3 1/2 years before the terrible accident that took the life of Alvin Rodecker. You can find that clip at -


Wednesday, April 25, 2018

The Murder of Margaret Zorn - Cold Case, 1976

Margaret Zorn, photo from Bethpage Tribune
Here's an unsolved crime from my childhood that has always stuck with me.

The robbery and murder of Margaret Zorn on November 22, 1976.
I didn't know the victim. My family only occasionally bought meals from the establishment owned by the Zorn family - we weren't regular customers but we liked the product, and yet the crime has always stayed with me.

Photo courtesy of Bethpage Chamber of Commerce


I don't think I fully appreciated how close my later place of employment (for 30 years) was to where her car, with her dead body in the front seat, was parked until I found a series of archived newspaper articles earlier this year. I wasn't working anywhere at the time of the crime. I was, maybe, in my first year of Junior High School.

The week of Thanksgiving is always a busy one at Zorn's and the daily deposit reflected this. On Monday, November 22, 1976, Margaret, 66-years-old, was driving to the Farmingdale, New York branch of Banker's Trust, 170 Conklin Street, with $6,000 in cash and $10,000 in checks. She left the store at 1:30 PM.

Traffic on Hempstead Turnpike/Conklin Street can be very slow and congested but when Margaret hadn't returned within 2 hours, the store employees called the bank to see if she'd made it there. She had not - they phoned the police.

This wasn't the only phone call to police that afternoon regarding Margaret Zorn. A 17-year-old boy had discovered Margaret slumped over in her car and he alerted a neighbor who then phoned police. This was at 3:40 PM. She was dead.


Photo from the Farmingdale Observer

Margaret's car was parked on the south side of Prospect Street, near the corner of Bernard Street. She had been shot once. Gone were the cash and checks but Margaret's jewelry hadn't been stolen.

Police interviewed more than 350 people and Margaret's family offered a reward of $5,000 for information leading to an arrest but to no avail. The rumor I'd always heard was, the ever-vague, "it was an inside job" but that gossip never led to an arrest.


Saturday, April 21, 2018

A Womb is Not an Oyster

Marie Swift's cause of death is not what makes this story a standout but instead the circumstances and events surrounding the crime.


On March 25, 1941 a man bicycling down the road on his way to work spotted what he thought was a bundle of clothes. Sadly, it was the body of 25-year-old Marie Swift.
Police couldn't immediately tell what killed the young woman but they could see her body had been dragged from a vehicle and dumped. Much was made of the fact that a single strand of blonde hair had been caught in the handle of Marie's purse. However, it was not so much the forensics but good solid police work that cracked this case wide open in record time. Also, I see no real mention of this clue at the trial so either it proved to be nothing or wasn't important once the police had a confession.

Police interviewed family members, Marie's fiancé Herman Ward, neighbors, cabbies and anyone who could help them track her movements the night before.


When the truth was revealed it was this -

Marie was pregnant and had gone to the home of Mrs. Addie Wilson for an abortion. Marie was dead within 30 minutes of walking through the door.

Afterwards, Mrs. Wilson, aged 48, didn't know what to do with the body. She couldn't call the police, abortion was illegal, and she couldn't shift the weight herself. Addie drove around until she located her 16-year-old son Clarence and implored him to help her. The two of them placed Marie's body and purse in Addie's car. They dumped everything just outside of the city limits then drove home to destroy any remaining evidence. But I bet they kept the $10 fee.


Addie Wilson was arrested on a murder charge, her son Clarence was held as a material witness and for good measure police arrested Marie's fiance 36-year-old Herman Ward because they felt they could prove he had made the appointment for the illegal procedure. Addie and her son both confessed but Herman continued to proclaim his innocence throughout the ordeal. However, eyewitness testimony at Herman's trial convinced a jury otherwise.


In April of 1941, Addie was found guilty of manslaughter & Herman was found guilty of conspiracy in connection with Marie's death. Both were sentenced to 5 years in prison. Herman was paroled in the Spring of 1942 and Addie gained her freedom in February 1943.


Here's what I don't understand about the case - Herman testified at his trial that he'd learned of Marie's pregnancy in February of 1941. They'd been dating for 5 years - so the baby was probably his. Their wedding was to take place a mere 6 days after the procedure. Why not pass your baby off as premature? And the biggest question of all - why would Addie Wilson think herself qualified to perform such a procedure when her profession was not midwife, doctor or nurse but oyster shucker? WTF?

Thursday, April 19, 2018

Panther Burglar turns deadly

Margaret Sablesack had immigrated to the US in 1901 from Yugoslavia when she was a child. As a young woman she worked as a milliner at a NYC hat factory until landing a job as a lab worker in St. Luke's Hospital.
By 1957, Margaret was 63-years-old, never married, crippled by arthritis, living on welfare in her 5-room, second-floor apartment at 1249 Amsterdam Avenue near 121st Street and maybe thinking her situation couldn't get any worse. Of course, she was wrong. Margaret had so little and yet on September 16th of that year, a man had broken into her apartment and was rifling through her things as she dozed in a chair. Margaret screamed when she saw him and the burglar grabbed her by the throat. Margaret fell to the ground and, still trying to silence her, the burglar knelt on her. He broke several of her ribs; she was 5' and maybe 100 pounds. His assault was a success - she was quiet....she was dead...her chest crushed. 

Margaret's body was discovered the next morning when a neighbor in her building saw the front door to her apartment wasn't closed all the way. He stepped in to investigate, found Margaret dead and her normally neat abode was far from tidy.

The police on the scene noticed that although there was a murder victim, the M.O. for the burglary was similar to dozens they'd been investigating for months. A thief so agile they'd dubbed him the "Panther Burglar." Margaret's brother William inspected the apartment and noticed nothing more than a portable radio was missing. That's what her life was worth.

Three latent prints were lifted off the wall nearest Margaret's body. Detectives compared these prints with over 500,000 currently on record but couldn't find a match. Again, 1957 so way before some computer program could zip through these to find corresponding ridges and whorls.

Detective Romoldo Imundi instructed all officers apprehending burglars in that vicinity to book every individual, fingerprint them and put those prints to the side for him to look at in the morning.

On February 24, 1958, at 12:45 AM, a young man, clutching a bulging paper bag, was spotted prowling around a back alley on Riverside Drive near 111th Street. When Patrolmen Owen Furtado and Rudolph Mingoia approached, he took off running. If this was the Panther Burglar, the nickname was appropriate. He was super fast and elusive. The officers would fire 6 shots at the man, none of them hit.

The thief eventually scampered up the fire escape of an apartment building at 628 W 114th Street and disappeared through a fifth story window. Furtado and Mingoia followed him and began searching the building. They could hear a shower running in a common hall bathroom. When they entered they found a man, naked, under the spray who claimed to live in the building. Furtado thought it sounded plausible but where was his towel and soap? And the clothes and paper bag balled up and stuffed underneath the claw-foot bathtub matched the man they were chasing. Inside the bag was a portable radio. He was arrested on suspicion of burglary.

Roland Wiggins was 18-years-old, 5' 9", husky but light on his feet. He lived in a single room apartment at 50 W. 112th Street, was an aspiring amateur boxer and had no previous criminal record....until now and his prints matched those found at Margaret Sablesack's apartment.

Roland admitted to the burglaries, over 60 in total. He would walk along the rooftops in the early morning hours then drop down to the ledges of the apartments on the upper floors. "It was as easy as walking up stairs" and enter through the bedroom windows.

Roland was escorted from Felony Court to the Homicide Division to be questioned about the events of September 16, 1957. After 2 days of questioning, Roland admitted that he had unintentionally killed Margaret while trying to muffle her screams.

On June 6, 1958, Roland pled guilty to second degree murder and was sentenced to 20 years to life; he was paroled on September 8, 1971 after serving 13 years.

photo courtesy of JET Magazine, March 20, 1958. I believe that's Det. Romolo Imundi on the left.
There is a very brief article in JET Magazine's March 20, 1958 edition which attributed this quote to Roland Wiggins but I can't find it anywhere else, "There's no thrill like the thrill of killing. I like to beat and break ribs."

When discussing his success at closing the case, Detective Imundi said "There are no super sleuths. Just guys pounding the pavement, asking a lot of questions. The trick is to presume nothing, to check everything." That definitely seems to have been the key to solving the murder of Margaret Sablesack and catching the "Panther Burglar."


Sunday, April 15, 2018

"I killed her but I didn't have any reason to."

Donna Joyce Isbell
"I killed her but I didn't have any reason to."

Just the kind of thing you want to hear when the babysitter strangles your 6-year-old daughter.


On the evening of December 29, 1951 sixteen-year-old Delora Mae Campbell was looking after Donna Isbell and her older brother Roy, aged 8, while Mrs. Isbell worked at a defense plant; Mr. Isbell was stationed at the Los Alamitos Naval Base. This wasn't the first time they'd left their 2 children with Delora Mae but the 5th or 6th. I'm sure the Isbells would never have hired Delora if they'd known that 18 months earlier she had been shipped to Los Angeles from Colorado after repeatedly running away from home and presenting a danger to her siblings. Delora is quoted as saying "I often felt like strangling my brothers and sisters."


Delora and her Aunt Lavada
Delora's parents & a judge thought they'd let her live several states away with her Aunt Lavada and her husband Gene since things weren't working out at home. Mrs. Campbell really thought she'd found the solution too. All the letters she'd gotten from Delora indicated she was happy & finally doing well in school.
Delora and her father
Here's an interesting contrast in reactions after Delora was in custody. Mrs. Campbell said "I would rather have heard she was dead...anything except this horrible thing." Meanwhile, Mr .Campbell told the press "We could hardly believe it. I guess it was one of those things that had to happen." Yes, but not to your children.

Delora's official story to the police was after putting the two kids to bed she watched a movie on TV about a wife who kills her husband and then is given a second chance to relive her life. Afterwards, Delora experienced a vision or dream in which she saw little Donna lying in bed with a green necktie around her neck. Delora then walked into the bedroom the children shared, unable to find a necktie she, picked up a discarded sock, wrapped it twice around Donna's neck, stuffed a portion of the bed sheet in the little girl's mouth so her screams wouldn't be heard and pulled. The girl barely struggled or made a sound. Roy slept undisturbed several feet away as the murder occurred.

Once she realized what she'd done, Delora panicked and ran out in to the rain knocking on doors until finally someone answered. That individual was Dr.Sidney Willner; he accompanied Delora back to the Isbell house then alerted the police. Delora never waivered from her explanation that it had all happened in a dream state. In 1952 she was committed to Caramillo State Hospital for the Insane.
Delora Mae Campbell, enroute to Camarillo State Hospital
Delora, feeling herself sane, walked away from the hospital twice during her stay there but was recaptured each time, once in 1952 & again in 1954. Eventually, but I'm not sure when, Delora Mae was released from custody. She returned to Colorado, married twice, the first union producing 5 children and died in 1984.


If you're like me, you're horrified but wondering "What movie was she watching?" I researched the TV listings for that night and have determined it's "Repeat Performance."
Roy Isbell holding the doll that will be placed in his sister's coffin

Saturday, April 14, 2018

An Intriguing Reveal


I'm not going to use this blog entry to tell the story of Ed and Celia Cooney but instead I want to suggest you read the book "The Bobbed Haired Bandit" by Stephen Duncombe and Andrew Mattson.


Their research methods are very similar to mine in that they rely heavily on newspaper archives. I doubt I'd uncover something they didn't. Plus, they each have the benefit of a formal education and do a very good job of telling not just the Cooneys' story but placing it in the context of everything else that was happening both politically and socially in NYC at the time.

Maybe you'll be sold on this book for the same reason I was?

Imagine your 85-year-old mother, who is suffering from Alzheimer's, routinely wandering away from her Florida home and starting to walk back toward NYC until the police locate her and bring her back. Now, imagine your mother tells you that she's worried "They'll find out who I am." And who is that? Why, "The Bobbed Haired Bandit," of course. Who? Everyone assumed it was the Alzheimer's talking.

Ed and Celia Cooney
Celia Cooney was very big news in 1924 and was still worthy of the public's attention in 1936. However, her exploits were all but forgotten by 1989 when Celia made this confession to her youngest son Ed, Jr. It was only after Celia's death that he and his older brother Patrick learned the truth about their parents' crime spree.

Friday, April 13, 2018

Too Proud or Too Crazy?

It wasn't uncommon for Gladys Quackenbush to have her name printed in the local newspapers. It was the fashion back in the day to announce whenever a young woman was off visiting relatives or attending some social function. But nobody was prepared for the story that would be appear in almost every newspaper on May 26, 1925. Sadly, it would soon became evident that the good folks at the New Jersey State Hospital for the Insane should have seen it coming.


In the early morning hours of May 26, 1925, Gladys, aged 28, had been killed in her sleep. Hacked to death with 14 blows of an axe. The killer was Aretta Quackenbush, her 65-year-old mother.


Aretta had been deemed "suicidal" and institutionalized since February 26, 1925 after she'd tried to take her own life; she'd been released from the NJ State Hospital for the Insane only a week before.


New Jersey State Hospital for the Insane

Neighbors had heard some arguing and raised voices coming from the  Quackenbush home in Tennent, NJ on the night of May 25, 1926. Aretta and Gladys often argued, mostly about money. Aretta's husband Holmes had died in 1904 and left them an inheritance but, it is believed Aretta lost most of the money due to "rash speculation" and the stress over their dwindling financial condition had affected her mind. By this time they were "practically penniless." Neither woman had a job and Aretta's pride got in the way whenever Gladys offered to seek employment. Gladys had made arrangements to leave the family home and relocate to Freehold, NJ to serve as a kind of live-in housekeeper. This might have been the last straw.

A neighbor, John Turneau, heard subdued crying as he walked by the Quackenbush home at 6:35 AM while on his way to work. He was worried, not enough to knock on the door although he did mention it to his supervisor. Another neighbor, Miss Laura Bennett, was walking past the Quackenbush home one hour later when Aretta opened the front door and called out "Laura, call Dr. Applegate. I've killed Gladys."

Laura didn't phone the police, remember this is 1925, but instead stopped in at another neighbor's house - one belonging to the Whalen family. Arthur Whalen, aged 20, offered to go over and investigate. He knocked at the door several times but received no reply until he finally heard a voice asking "Is that you Laura? You can't come in." Arthur walked around the house until he could peek through a window. Arthur saw Aretta in blood-stained clothes, she was mumbling "Oh, my God" over and over again. Arthur returned home then telephoned the State Police.

NJ State Trooper James McCormick
Trooper James McCormick responded to the call in civilian clothes. He saw Aretta walking back towards her own home from the Whalen house. She'd gone over there for a pail of water but had been refused entry. Can't say I blame them. Aretta was uncooperative at first, until she saw his Police badge then she allowed Trooper McCormick to enter her home and it was there he discovered the body of Gladys and blood splatter everywhere. Gladys is described as being "unrecognizable" due to the severe blows to her head. Any one of which would have been sufficient to kill her.


Aretta had injuries of her own. Her eyes were swollen nearly shut and there was blood on her forehead. Aretta claimed Gladys had attacked her the night before with a hammer so her killing Gladys was either "self-defense" or "revenge." Authorities believe that Aretta's wounds were self-inflicted. She readily admitted what she had done and told investigators, "It was all over in five minutes." During the car ride to the Police HQ, Aretta  tried to jump from the moving car but was held back.

Given Aretta's recent hospital stay and her actions on the morning of the killing, she was quite easily declared insane and incapable of even assisting in her own defense. She was remanded, once again, to the New Jersey State Hospital for the Insane. I don't believe she was ever released. Aretta is listed as an inmate of the Hospital in the 1940 Census and she died on December 18, 1943. Both Gladys and Aretta are buried in the Old Tennant Churchyard in Manalapan, NJ. The family farm, home and personal property were sold after Aretta was committed and the proceeds were used to pay for her care at the Hospital.

There was much finger-pointing after the fact and, of course, promises from the Hospital to do a better job so that this kind of tragedy could be avoided in future. Dr. Carl Pierson testified that he knew Aretta had attempted to take her own life three months prior but that was all. Judge Lawrence who headed the three person lunacy committee charged with investigating the incident, produced documentation from when Aretta was admitted in February which recorded the fact that she had also threatened the life of her daughter. The eminent Dr. Henry Cotton felt comfortable blaming Aretta's relations, and that included the victim, who had agreed to Aretta's release. I'd also like to note that Dr. Cotton is the only one who refers, numerous times, to Gladys as being "feeble-minded." If Gladys was feeble-minded, why would the hospital consider her capable of caring for Aretta? 
Dr. Henry Cotton
Dr. Cotton would have to get used to being on the defensive. Not only in this matter but for his methods in general. Dr. Cotton strongly believed there was a definite connection between insanity and infection in the body. He and his staff of surgeons would routinely perform operations on the patients, often times it seems without their consent. It was common practice to remove any organs they suspected to be harboring infection, also the patients' teeth. The staff also performed sterilization procedures on the patients. Any surgery was a risk, especially when there were no antibiotics then and a real danger of post-operative infection. There might have been a high mortality rate as a result of these procedures but the patients would be considered sane when they expired.  Naturally, not everyone considered Dr. Cotton a monster. He did actually believe in treating the patients more humanely.