Why are you here and why am I doing this?

Why are you here and why am I doing this?

If you're like me, THIS is as close to crime as you want to get.

You want to maintain a safe distance and delve into it when it's convenient for you; not when some lunatic knocks on your door in the middle of the night, runs you off the road or approaches you in a parking lot.

Maybe you are a Murderino?

I'm someone who resolves every New Year's Eve to NOT be the victim of a crime.

Some of the crimes I'll describe here aren't horrific or even result in death, but they're still situations to be avoided. Who wants the drama or the paperwork associated with a non-violent crime? Not me.

I know I'm not the only one who's interested in reading about crime & criminals. I hope to use this blog to share that interest with others.

My process is to find something in an old newspaper, news broadcast or my own memory that grabs my attention and delve deep. I research the cases and people using newspaper and magazine archives, genealogy sites plus court or prison documents (when I can afford them). Lately the way I write the stories has changed. I'm starting to show the effort I've made to track down specific details. I also seem to be posting less frequently. This can be attributed to the fact that I'm now concerned with the As Close to Crime YouTube channel as well as my habit of falling deeper and deeper into rabbit holes with each new entry. I'd rather have quality than quantity, so I've come to terms with the lessening output.

I try not rely too heavily on other websites or books but I credit people when it's appropriate. In fact, if my main source of information is someone else's book, I'll just recommend the book. This was the case with "The Bobbed Haired Bandit."

Don't expect too many Top 10 lists from me. I instead prefer to select the more obscure crimes that some visitors to this blog have either never heard of or haven't thought about in awhile.

I also like to give attention to not just those who break the law but those who uphold the law. So you can expect to see some of that here.

There's a companion YouTube Channel for this blog, called As Close to Crime, where I occasionally post clips related to particular blog entries or just random clips concerning criminal activity. I'm never going to post an entire commercially available film.

Be sure to subscribe to the channel or this blog.

Search This Blog

Saturday, April 21, 2018

A Womb is Not an Oyster

Marie Swift's cause of death is not what makes this story a standout but instead the circumstances and events surrounding the crime.


On March 25, 1941 a man bicycling down the road on his way to work spotted what he thought was a bundle of clothes. Sadly, it was the body of 25-year-old Marie Swift.
Police couldn't immediately tell what killed the young woman but they could see her body had been dragged from a vehicle and dumped. Much was made of the fact that a single strand of blonde hair had been caught in the handle of Marie's purse. However, it was not so much the forensics but good solid police work that cracked this case wide open in record time. Also, I see no real mention of this clue at the trial so either it proved to be nothing or wasn't important once the police had a confession.

Police interviewed family members, Marie's fiancé Herman Ward, neighbors, cabbies and anyone who could help them track her movements the night before.


When the truth was revealed it was this -

Marie was pregnant and had gone to the home of Mrs. Addie Wilson for an abortion. Marie was dead within 30 minutes of walking through the door.

Afterwards, Mrs. Wilson, aged 48, didn't know what to do with the body. She couldn't call the police, abortion was illegal, and she couldn't shift the weight herself. Addie drove around until she located her 16-year-old son Clarence and implored him to help her. The two of them placed Marie's body and purse in Addie's car. They dumped everything just outside of the city limits then drove home to destroy any remaining evidence. But I bet they kept the $10 fee.


Addie Wilson was arrested on a murder charge, her son Clarence was held as a material witness and for good measure police arrested Marie's fiance 36-year-old Herman Ward because they felt they could prove he had made the appointment for the illegal procedure. Addie and her son both confessed but Herman continued to proclaim his innocence throughout the ordeal. However, eyewitness testimony at Herman's trial convinced a jury otherwise.


In April of 1941, Addie was found guilty of manslaughter & Herman was found guilty of conspiracy in connection with Marie's death. Both were sentenced to 5 years in prison. Herman was paroled in the Spring of 1942 and Addie gained her freedom in February 1943.


Here's what I don't understand about the case - Herman testified at his trial that he'd learned of Marie's pregnancy in February of 1941. They'd been dating for 5 years - so the baby was probably his. Their wedding was to take place a mere 6 days after the procedure. Why not pass your baby off as premature? And the biggest question of all - why would Addie Wilson think herself qualified to perform such a procedure when her profession was not midwife, doctor or nurse but oyster shucker? WTF?

No comments: