"Those ARE NOT my thighs!"

Actress Constance Bennett was kind of a big deal in the 1930s. In that 10 year span, she appeared in 26 movies.

In 1931, Constance signed a two picture deal with MGM that earned her $300,000.00. This made her, however briefly, the highest-paid actress in Hollywood.

One of those pictures, "The Easy Way" was a success and the studio turned a profit of $193,000.00. That's over $3M, in today's money.

That same year, Warner Bros paid her $30,000 a week to act in (the aptly named) movie "Bought!"

Constance worked for less money per picture in 1934 but took a percentage of the gross. She was paid $60,000 for her performance in "The Affairs of Cellini" but took 5% of the gross. She negotiated a similar deal for "Moulin Rouge" but increased her take to 10% of the gross.

Constance Bennett is, arguably, best remembered these days for her role as the spectral Marion Kirby in "Topper" (1937) and "Topper Takes a Trip" (1938).

Constance was popular with audiences but famously temperamental and perpetually litigious. Constance Bennett was in court countless times in her life as either a defendant or a plaintiff. I'm not sure what her total win-loss record was.

Judge Burnell

While researching this story, I did have to laugh at an account of 63-year-old Judge Charles S. Burnell's telling Constance, then the plaintiff in a February 1938 breach of contract lawsuit against Gaumont-British Picture Corp, that she was "no picture star to him, just another garden variety witness" with whom he was losing patience and instructed her to "just sit there and look beautiful."

Constance apparently "flushed delicately under her veil, looked demurely at the judge" and promised to try.

The court found in favor of the plaintiff and Constance was awarded $35,000.

When a reporter mentioned to Constance that her multiple lawsuits (a record five lawsuits in 1938) had her spending quite a lot of time at the courthouse, she countered with "Yes, I'm even thinking of building me a little penthouse on the roof, so I'll be handy."

There's a oft-repeated story about Constance being sued by a Hollywood taxi driver after she refused to pay a $4.00 fare. "He took the long way around," she said. "It's a point of honor."

According to a March 1935 Vanity Fair article, "The most cordially disliked woman in Hollywood is undoubtedly Constance Bennett."

With this in mind, it's safe to say there's a good chance that when Constance hired renowned artist Willy Pogany in 1935 to paint a life-sized portrait of her, he expected she'd give him a hard time but he never imagined she'd refuse to pay for the final product.

Constance Bennett was a busy lady and Willy Pogany understood that. Pogany told her that she'd only have to pose a couple of times if she would provide him with a photograph of herself and the dress she wanted to be seen wearing in the portrait. Constance chose a blue satin dress, gave him a photograph and even showed him the spot on her wall wear the painting would hang. A few days later she went to the studio and posed for 90 minutes.

According to Constance, when she showed up at his studio for the first sitting, the portrait was nearly done; all that was missing was her face. She took exception to the way her body was painted and told him so. Pogany agreed to make alterations to the waist and thighs, both were too thick for her liking. And she didn't like the way she shown sitting in the chair.

According to Pogany, "At first she had her legs crossed in the picture. She said it made her thighs look too big. I changed that. Then she had me lengthen the hands and legs. If she'd stand up, in the picture, she'd be over six feet tall. But that was all right. Her objections on that score were perfectly justified." Connie's actual height was 5'4."

The only complaint that fell on deaf ears was Constance Bennett asking that her fingernails be painted a bright ruby red. "One spot of red," Pogany said, "would unbalance the entire color harmony and make the painting look fantastic on that greenish-white background."

The next and final sitting wouldn't happen for another 6 months.

When his subject wasn't available to pose in person, Pogany used a total of five models, including his favorite model, Elaine Cox Pogany, who was also his second wife. According to the artist, these women had posed for over 200 hours. Constance Bennett spent less than 4 hours posing for her portrait.

When Pogany considered himself done, he sent the painting to Constance but she sent it right back and refused payment.

Constance was adamantly refusing to pay for a painting that she felt looked nothing like her and she had certainly never agreed to pay more than $500.00.

Willy Pogany's vision of Constance Bennett

By November 1937, Willy Pogany felt he had no choice but to take his client to court. It wasn't just the fact that he'd expected to be paid but Constance was highly critical of his work and not especially quiet about it. Miss Bennett's lawyers were worried Pogany would sue for libel.

Willy Pogany was offended and perhaps worried that negative publicity would impact his professional career since Pogany was also employed by the movie studios as a set designer and art director.

Boris Karloff and Willy Pogany, 1932

Depositions were given by both sides in January 1938 for a trial that would take place May/June 1938. Constance Bennett was quoted as saying "I won't pay a cent. I wouldn't take it as a gift."

Constance testified that the woman in the painting was "an Amazon" and while Constance claimed to be "embarrassed to death at making a comment on Mrs. Pogany's size," she described Elaine as "a large woman" and readily let the court know that Elaine Pogany weighed 135 while her own weight was no more than 100 pounds. Constance believed Pogany had made her look like "a sack of Portland cement with a rope tied around the middle" and that her expression, as painted, was one that she'd be ashamed of on a dark and cloudy night.

I was unable to find an actual photo of Elaine Pogany but here's what she looked like to her husband -

1950 book by Willy Pogany

Pogany spent 2 hours on the witness stand defending his work and explaining the process. "Anyone who says the picture does not look like Miss Bennett is reflecting on my ability as an artist. It is a good picture, a very good one."

Pogany conceded that the portrait, "may not be a pretty picture, in the Hollywood sense, but it is a good picture and one that does look like Miss Bennett.

"The portrait of Miss Bennett is a serious study. So many persons aren't used to serious works and don't know how to appreciate them. They want enlarged photographs. My picture isn't a photograph. It is an artist's conception of the subject - a stylized portrait."

Constance maintained her position by testifying, "My idea was to have a portrait of myself; not what Mr. Pogany thought I looked like. It doesn't look a bit like me."

A number of life-sized photographs of Connie's thighs were placed around the courtroom for the jury to study. Reporters and spectators alike were disappointed that Connie's actual thighs were not much on display throughout the proceedings.

Constance took the stand and said Pogany's portrait "looks like a cheap chromo they used to hang in barrooms."

"Is that so?" exclaimed Pogany. "How would she know?"

Pogany's attorney asked Constance whether she had ever studied art.

"No," she replied, "but when I was 15, I studied dress designing, but I really don't know the difference between decorative and realistic art."

L.A. Conservancy photo

Next up were two art experts, Earl Stendahl and Ralph Holmes, both of whom asserted that Pogany's portrait was worth as much as $5,000.

Well, whatever Constance was expecting when she commissioned the work, Pogany's portrait was not what she had in mind.

"I told him that my thigh was too thick, that the arm was out of proportion, the shoulders too round, I didn't like the hairline and also that the face was too thin," she testified. Constance disliked the little curlicues around her mouth and furthermore, she thought Pogany had made her look "pop-eyed." Plus, her hair was the wrong shade; it was too red. Miss Bennett's lawyer, Barry Brennan, had her remove her hat so the jury could see her blonde hair.

"Is your hair the same color now that it was then?" Brennan asked.

"Oh, yes indeed," she replied.

Constance beside the Tino Costa portrait

Just to show she wasn't unwilling to pay for good art, Constance referenced a previous portrait purchase.

[She didn't say how much she'd paid but the cost was  $2,000.]

Constance reportedly beamed as Tino Costa's painting of herself and her adopted son Peter was carried into the courtroom so that the jurors and experts could see for themselves what she was expecting Pogany to deliver.

"That goes to show you that when you go to the right artist, you get your money's worth."

[Costa himself thought Constance Bennett was his "most temperamental" subject to paint. In contrast, he labeled Constance's sister Joan Bennett as "the best" and said Shirley Temple "the worst - because she wiggled so much."]

Earl Standahl was asked to compare the two portraits of Miss Bennett and give his opinion.

"To my mind," Standahl said, "Costa's work might be considered as more realistic or photographic, but an art critic would consider it as a mere copy. It is not idealistic and doesn't show the imagination Pogany's picture does. The white background of Pogany's is very intricate and complicated.

"It is more intriguing. It has a vibrating quality. It is alive. It has fervent fire.

"There are two ways to paint a picture. One way is to make it look like a photograph; the other is to give it some artistic life. I should call the Costa picture one with photographic quality."

Standahl valued the Costa painting for only $3,000 to $4,000, much less than the $5,000 price tag he had placed on Pogany's portrait.

Connie didn't really care what the experts thought of the portrait; her mind was made up. She didn't like it.

In fact, as court was recessed for the weekend and attorneys suggested Exhibit 1, the Pogany portrait, be placed in a secure location, Bennett quipped, "I don't think anyone will steal it."

Before the case was to be turned over to the jury of nine women and three men, a letter written by Pogany to Rex Cole, Miss Bennett's business manager, was read out in court. This letter showed how the price had increased by Pogany from the originally agreed upon cost of $500 to $3,500.

"In a spirit of friendliness I made a few changes in the picture," Pogany wrote. "You ask me how I arrive at a charge of "$3,500 and I will tell you this - that Miss Bennett gave me a commission to paint such a portrait of her.

"I have been engaged in the work for nearly two years and have employed models which have cost me hundreds of dollars since she would not pose for me and as a matter of fact the price should be $5,000, instead of $3,500, considering all the work I have done."

Pogany claimed that Miss Bennett had originally asked for one of his quicker portraits, the going rate for such a likeness was $500. When Constance didn't care for it, he agreed to create a more detailed, artistic and complex portrait but let her know that the price could not remain at the agreed upon $500.00. Unfortunately for Pogany, there was no documentation to back this up.

Judge Stephens

On Friday, June 3, 1938, once the jury was excused for the weekend, the defense filed a motion asking for Judge Jess E. Stephens to render a directed verdict as the prosecution had failed to prove their case.

The judge agreed and ruled in favor of the defense...much to the disappointment of the jury.

Judge Stephens determined that Pogany could not prove Miss Bennett had agreed to pay more than $500 for the portrait nor did Pogany deliver a portrait that met the expectations of his client, as he had promised he would. Superior Court Judge Stephens suggested the case would have been better suited for Municipal Court. 

Jurors made a point of letting Pogany know that had they been given the opportunity, they would have ruled in his favor and awarded an even bigger amount. Juror W. B. George, Jr. said it was "a beautiful painting. We would have returned a judgement for $5,000, if he had sued for that much."

Pogany issued a statement saying "Miss Bennett cast cheap sneers at my work" and "when her mud-throwing mis-fired, she fell back on the defense that she was not supposed to know the value of my work, since she knew nothing about art.

"As to her ignorance about art, I must admit she presented the most convincing proof."

Constance smiled in triumph as the judge's verdict was read and, according to Joan Bennett's 1970 autobiography "The Bennettt Playbill, "for the benefit of reporters, Constance showed her views of the matter by kicking a hole in the canvas."

This can not possibly be true but it makes for a good story.

Besides, Constance Bennett was too busy to gloat. She had to get ready for her upcoming $250,000 "defamation of character" and "libel lawsuit" against radio host Jimmie Fidler and his sponsors.

Following Judge Stephens's ruling, Pogany indicated he was considering an appeal of the verdict. As such, the portrait remained in the custody of the court.

On June 21, 1938, the court ordered the portrait to be sold for $108.00 to cover the court costs of the trial.

In 1939, when Willy Pogany was doing interviews to promote his latest endeavor, a full color cartoon for Walter Lantz Productions, written by his wife Elaine and animated by him, called "Scrambled Eggs," Pogany revealed that the much-debated portrait of Constance Bennett was now in his possession and on display in his living room.

"I have had several offers for it, but I have refused them all. I think it is a beautiful picture; I just try to forget that it is a portrait of that woman."

Jimmie Fidler

About that lawsuit Constance filed against Jimmie Fidler - on December 28, 1937, Jimmie Fidler talked on air about a severe on-set snubbing actress Patsy Kelly had received by "Merrily We Live" co-star Constance Bennett. Bennett denied the incident, accused Fidler of making these false remarks with malicious intent and on January 3, 1938 she filed a lawsuit seeking $250,000 in damages.

That amount would increase by an additional $100,000 after Constance learned Fidler had made similar disparaging remarks against her during previous broadcasts.

On October 17, 1938, Judge Robert W. Kenny ruled against Bennett and in favor of Fiddler. The judge didn't feel there was any intended malice in the remarks, whether false or not, and pointed out that Miss Bennett and all motion picture actors are public figures.

circa 1924

It's worth mentioning that in 1942, Constance announced that, Peter Bennett, whom she until now steadily maintained was her adopted son, was actually her biological son.

Constance claimed she had long ago made the decision to lie about Peter's birth so that her wealthy second husband Philip Morgan Plant wouldn't file for custody when they divorced in 1929, after nearly 4 years of marriage.

When, the supposedly childless, 39-year-old Philip Morgan Plant died in 1941, and news that a $633,000 trust fund was to be established for Plant's descendants, Connie submitted her son's name and revealed his heritage.

An out of court settlement was reached on November 18, 1943 after Connie supposedly promised Plant's mother and widow that she would take the stand and give a full accounting of their married life. A judge awarded 14-year-old Peter $138,328.00. That's over $1.8M, in today's money. The money was to turned over to Peter when he turned 21.

On November 30, 1943, the Connecticut Superior Court affirmed a Probate Court decision declaring that Phillip Morgan Plant died without issue. That was supposed to settle, once and for all, the question of him having children.

On June 8, 1944, Constance obtained guardianship of the trust fund.

In 1950, when Peter came of age, Constance turned over what was left of the trust fund money. The amount remaining was $97,641.00. When asked by New York Surrogate Judge George Frankenthaler to explain where the rest of the money went, Constance claimed $40,687.00 had been spent on Peter's education and care. She waived her right to the customary guardianship fee.

Mae Rovensky

After Mae C. Rovensky, Philip Morgan Plant's mother, died on July 21, 1956, Peter Bennett Plant, then 27-years-old, petitioned the Surrogate Court to be considered one of her descendants and thus entitled to a share of her multi-million dollar estate, despite not being acknowledged in her will.

Peter claimed that Mae Rovensky had "been coerced" by unnamed sources into believing that he was not her grandson. Furthermore, he claimed that Mae was "not of sound mind by reason of old age and illness" and was "mentally incapacitated" when she'd signed the will.

Despite his intentions to stake a claim, Peter failed to file the required amended petition with Manhattan's Superior Court by the appointed October 2, 1956 deadline. He was granted an extension and a hearing was scheduled for November 27, 1956.

The legal battle dragged on until July 1, 1958, due to several family members challenging the terms of the will, including Peter and Mae's two granddaughters. Ultimately, Mae Rovensky's money was divided between her husband, several churches, hospitals and numerous charities. I see no indication that Peter was awarded anything.

What became of the portrait after Willy Pogany's July 30, 1955 death? I do not know and I was sorry not to have found a color photo of it.

Elaine Cox Pogany, 23 years younger than Willy, died in March 1993.

Constance Bennett died on July 24, 1965.

Does a leopard change its spots? Does war change a man?

Gladys Marsden

December 30, 2020 will mark the 75th anniversary of the murder of Gladys Cordelia Marsden.

There was no attempt to conceal Gladys's body. Her badly beaten and nearly nude body wasn't so much on display behind Detroit's Edward Ruddiman School but instead left behind after someone took what they wanted then moved on.

School engineer Edward Yates said that when he first spotted her that Sunday morning at 8 AM, he thought it was simply "a bundle of old clothes." If only ...

Gladys's shoes and stockings were in place but her slip was pushed up around her neck; everything else had been forcibly removed. From the injuries she'd obviously sustained, Gladys must have put up a heck of a fight so police were already thinking it was possible that her clothes had been torn off in the struggle.

The authorities would have to wait until the autopsy results were in before they would make a statement as to whether or not she'd been raped. She had not.

Gladys had not been sexually assaulted but she had been brutally beaten. She suffered a broken left jaw, four of her teeth had been knocked out, she had a fractured vertebra, a cerebral hemorrhage and there were long, deep scratches in the flesh of her face, arms and legs. Cause of death was strangulation; the beating she suffered beforehand was brutal.

Police were surprised and disappointed that, although her fingernails were long, there was nothing underneath them that could help forensically. A freezing rain had fallen overnight, so that didn't help either.

Google map satellite image of the Ruddiman School's grounds where Gladys was killed.

The contents of Gladys's purse were strewn about the crime scene; no cash or jewelry was found so it was most certainly a robbery homicide. A three cent postage stamp was found stuck to her buttock.

Ed Yates, at the crime scene, handling Gladys's stuff

This was a terrible end to 1945 and to what, police would later learn, had been a good time out.

Gladys Marsden was a twice-divorced, 43-year-old woman with a grown son, born of her first marriage.

Her son, Tearle Thomas Wofford, was 22-years-old, currently serving in the Navy and stationed in San Diego; he had a wife Mary and a 6-month-old daughter Sherry.

Gladys was employed as an Army ordnance stenographer and she lived alone at 16928 Tireman Avenue in the relatively new low-income housing development called Howard Gardens.

Gladys might have been living alone but she wasn't going to ring in the new year alone because 76-year-old Mary Barnes, was in town with her new husband August. Mary wasn't Gladys's biological mother but she was the only mother Gladys had ever known.

Mary Barnes

Her own mother, Nettie, had died on February 10, 1903, at the age of 38, when Gladys was just shy of 2 months old. Mary Parson, herself a young widow, had married into the Marsden family on October 1, 1904, and she had cared for Gladys, one of six Marsden children, as if she were her own child. A seventh child, a son, was born to Mary and Thomas Marsden in 1906.

After Gladys's 82-year-old father Thomas died on March 5, 1941, mother and daughter lived together until Mary moved to Ohio to marry August Barnes in October of 1945.

Two months later, newlyweds Mary and August were in town visiting Gladys. They'd been in Detroit since Friday, December 28, 1945.

Mary recounted to police the events of the last night she'd seen her daughter.

On Saturday, December 29th, Gladys took Mr. and Mrs. Barnes to a neighborhood bar that she was known to frequent called the Southfield Tavern at 7212 Southfield Road.

Saturday turned into Sunday and the two older folks were tired. They announced they were leaving and they urged Gladys to come with them but Gladys declined. She had just that evening made the acquaintance of a handsome young soldier. According to Mary, Gladys told them to "run along, that she would be coming in a few minutes."

Maybe the multiple medals and ribbons that adorned his uniform gave everyone a false sense of security. The soldier told Mary, "I'll see her home, so don't worry." Mary and August left, never to see Gladys alive again. She was only six blocks from her home when she was killed.

Google Maps depiction of key locations the night Gladys died

This was the best lead police would have so they interviewed anyone who'd been at the bar that night, as either patron or employee.

Witnesses testified that Gladys and the soldier had left the bar together some time between 1:30 and 2 AM. 

Those who remembered the soldier, described him as being about 25-years-old, 5' 8", maybe 155 pounds. He had black wavy hair, a small pencil mustache. He was wearing a garrison cap, Pacific Campaign ribbons and a Combat Infantryman's badge. The soldier had entered the bar around 9 PM with an attractive, sweater-wearing young woman. The two had struck up a conversation with a man known only as "Louie."

Eyewitnesses said that after awhile the solider and his girlfriend had an argument causing her to leave "in a huff." At this point the solider moved over to where Gladys, Mary and August were sitting. The young man focused all his attention on Gladys and she seemed to be happy to have it. Stanley Grabowski, bartender that evening, remembered serving Gladys and her new friend 6 drinks, all of which were paid for by Gladys.

It was also noted that this behavior was unusual for Gladys. Mrs. Marsden had been a regular at the Southfield Tavern for nearly a year, usually going there three times a week, but she rarely came in alone and this was the first time anyone could recall Gladys associating with a stranger. She was described as jovial, well-liked and a "good drinker." I'm not exactly sure what that implies but perhaps Gladys could hold her liquor and not start a fight after she'd had a few.

Regular customer Ed Kranz couldn't tell police who the soldier was but he was positive he'd seen the same man in the bar earlier that day but in civilian clothes. Bartender Stanley Grabowski hadn't worked the day shift so he was unable to confirm this.

Police put out a three state APB for anyone matching the description of this soldier. They also wanted to talk to "Louie" and the mysterious sweater girl so the police made sure newspapers carried descriptions of the two individuals.

The following day a parked, stolen car with two blood-stained men's shirts in the backseat was found in Battle Creek, Michigan.

Nathan Hibbs, a 27-year-old Jackson, Michigan civilian and the suspected car thief, bore a resemblance to this mysterious soldier and he admitted to sometimes wearing an army uniform in public. He provided a solid alibi for the murder but he had no explanation for the blood-stained shirts.

Police were hopeful but ultimately there was no connection between that vehicle or the man who'd stolen it and Gladys Marsden. Nathan Hibbs would later plead guilty to having stolen the car.

Arrested along with Hibbs was Nicholas Bockmiller, an 18-year-old sailor stationed at the Great Lakes Naval Training Station. He too was fingerprinted, photographed and held for questioning. Police were photographing any man involved, hoping to find the soldier and/or "Louie" but so far none of the witnesses were able to say "Yes, that's him."

Police also suspected a 32-year-old unnamed married man with a previous arrest for rape, who had never been prosecuted because the victim refused to press charges, but again they had to admit there was no evidence against him and this clearly was not a sex crime. Perhaps the police were just hoping they'd finally be able to put the man away for something.

Police were no closer to finding "Louie" or the sweater-clad girl but less than a week after the murder, they were finally able to identify the uniform worn by the soldier as most likely belonging to a member of the Michigan State Troops.

[The Michigan State Troops were a type of Home Guard, intended to fill a void created when Michigan's National Guardsmen were activated and sent overseas during WWII.]

Owen J. Cleary, 1943 photo

On Saturday, January 5, 1946, the Detroit Free Press printed an announcement from Inspector Charles E. Searle, of the Homicide Squad, regarding the identification of the suspect's uniform. A circular with the suspect's physical description had been sent to Col. Owen J. Cleary, Michigan State Troops
commander.

Newspapers and their readers followed the story very closely.

Charles Blattert, a 30-year-old Detroit resident, was one such reader.

Charles and his wife Norma thought the description of the soldier, except for the age, matched that of Charles's younger brother Walter. They also knew that Walter had been to the Southfield Tavern in the past.

When they next saw Walter, January 5th, 1946, Charles could tell something was troubling him. "When he visited us on Saturday, he was in dreadful shape. He hadn't eaten. He hadn't slept."

Walter readily confessed to his brother that he was involved in the death of Gladys Marsden and Charles urged him to turn himself in.

That evening, January 5, 1946, Charles and Walter Blattert walked into police headquarters and Charles announced that Walter had something to tell them.

When later asked why he would voluntarily turn himself in, Walter admitted, "I thought I might get a break and get less time." Walter also revealed that the coverage of the investigation by The Free Press that had him nervous.

Walter J. Blattert and his older brother Charles
The Times Herald -  April 4, 1946

Walter confessed to punching Gladys several times the night of December 30th but said he didn't know she was dead until he read it in the papers the next day. He blamed the violence on the excessive drinking both he and Gladys had done while at the tavern.

According to Walter, he was escorting Gladys home and they were taking a shortcut through the school grounds when they began arguing and he'd slapped her. He explained that this was "to sober her up" and to "quiet her down" because she was making too much noise.

"I was getting pretty drunk when we got to the street, and she was making a hell of a racket. I bawled her out for being so noisy in front of a bunch of kids, and that's when the argument started."

According to Walter, he slapped Gladys to sober her up but she slapped him back and when she did, Gladys came in contact with an old war wound of his. The searing pain sent him into a blind rage and he repeatedly punched her in the face. Walter adamantly denied strangling Gladys though and he certainly wouldn't have raped her. If Gladys was strangled, "Somebody else must have got to her after I did. When I left her she rose on one elbow and made a little noise in her throat," Blattert recalled.

He struck her at least a half a dozen times and shoved her against a brick wall. "She was too drunk to fight very hard."

Every time Gladys tried to stand up, Walter knocked her down. When he saw she was out, Walter removed Gladys's wrist watch then went through her purse, stealing $9.45 and a compact. He said remembered little about the incident "until I woke up the next morning and saw the compact and the watch."

Walter's talk of an "old war wound" was true but there were certainly some half-truths and outright lies in his version of events. More lies were to come and lies told before Walter even met Gladys would soon be revealed.

Walter J. Blattert was a decorated veteran who had fought for five months in France, Belgium and Germany with General Patton's Third Army. That was true.

It was in Germany, on February 13, 1945, that Walter was wounded by shrapnel, leaving an 11 inch scar on his hip and some slight paralysis. He was awarded a Purple Heart and two Battle Stars.

In September 1945, following several months in a London hospital, Walter received a medical discharge. He'd logged 15 months of service.

[The date of Walter's injury coincides with the bombing of Dresden and in an effort to verify that, I requested Walter's military records. Unfortunately, his records and millions of other documents were destroyed in a July 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center. I was notified by mail that a few scraps of water-damaged and potentially moldy scraps of paper relating to Pvt. Blattert had been located and that for $70 these documents could be photocopied and mailed to me. That seemed a little too pricey for me, especially as I had no idea what information I would be paying for.]

Police asked Walter about his female companion on the night that Gladys died and he told them all he knew was that her name was "Jean" and that she was someone he'd just met on the street trolley ride to the bar.

"I was looking for excitement," he said. "I got on a W. Warren street car. I picked up a girl on the car after a flirtation. We got off the car and went to the bar, where I saw Mrs. Marsden.

"I was nearly broke, so I started taking all the drinks that were offered." [No doubt the assorted medals and ribbons Walter chose to wear that night went a long way to garnering free drinks.]

The police wanted to know what became of Mrs. Marsden's stolen possessions?

Walter told the police that after learning Gladys was dead, he disposed of the compact and watch. He had participated in a military funeral the following day and dumped the items en route to the ceremony. Police Lt. Charles Buckhold declined to reveal the location of the cemetery but on January 7th, Blattert was escorted from his jail cell to the cemetery in an attempt to retrieve the items. The search was fruitless.

What did Walter do after the altercation with Mrs. Marsden?

Walter claimed he rode around on a succession of street cars, falling asleep twice until finally he made his way back to the Troops barracks.

Walter was fingerprinted and photographed. Mary Barnes and Stanley Grabowski positively identified Walter as the man they last saw Gladys Marsden with.

The police stopped looking for "Louie."

Walter might have been able to pass for 25-years-old but he was actually only 17-years-old when he killed Gladys. At the time of his arrest, newspapers were reporting his age as 19 and why wouldn't they. That's what his discharge papers said. Nobody realized that Walter had lied about his birth date when he enlisted in the military. He was born in 1928 not 1925.

What would cause a young man to lie about his age and join the army at the age of 16? Patriotism? Perhaps. Disappointment and loss? Perhaps.

In 1938, when Walter was 10, his 16-year-old brother Edmund, Jr. had died in a drowning accident. Walter's niece Marie died in October 1942 when she was only 15 months old. Two months later Walter's 54-year-old father Edmund died, on December 17, 1942, following a 5 month long illness. Maybe Walter just wanted to see something of the world before he too died? Or maybe the idea of sanctioned violence appealed to him.

According to Charles Blattert, prior to serving in the army his brother Walter "was a good kid and didn't drink before he went into the war."

One thing Walter didn't reveal, perhaps not even to his brother, was that at the time he was pummeling Gladys Marsden, he was out on a $500 bond and awaiting trial on a charge of robbery.

Walter and a recently discharged Coast Guardsman, 17-year-old Samuel Jackson, were accused of beating up 56-year-old Mrs. Freida Astrein and stealing her purse, which held $20.00.

Police Inspector Marvin Lane, of the Holdup Squad, said that in more than a dozen cases from September 20 to December 25, 1945 descriptions of the suspect resembled Walter Blattert. In all cases, the victims were slugged before being robbed.

Police soon learned the identity of Blattert's date the evening Gladys was killed.

Her name was Barbara Jean Moss. She was 19-years-old, the wife of an active duty Marine who was serving overseas, the mother of two boys (aged 2 years and 1 year old) and despite initially lying to police about the extent of their friendship, Barbara Jean was very well-acquainted with Walter Blattert. The two had been keeping company since September 11, 1945.


In fact, when Walter Blattert was arrested on November 9, 1945 for beating and robbing Freida Astrein, he told police the victim's purse, which was found in his car, belonged to Barbara Jean.

Police detectives repeatedly went back to Barbara Jean to ask about the night of December 30th. During a second interview, Barbara Jean told police it was true that she and Walter had argued while at the Southfield Tavern and that she had left in a huff. Barbara Jean said she arrived back home at 10 PM. "Home" being 8102 Rutland Street, part of the Herman Gardens housing project. Yes, the same housing project that Gladys lived in however there's no evidence that they two knew one another.

As you can see from the photo below, there was more than one building in the development. If you scroll back up to the "key locations" map, Rutland Street, which runs North and South, is two streets west of Gladys's home.

Howard Gardens - Manning Bros. Inc. photo, 1944

Five hours after Barbara Jean had left the Southfield Tavern, Walter knocked on her door. He washed blood off his hands, threw the money, compact and wrist watch on the bed and said "I had to slap her to get it."

Barbara Jean claimed to know nothing about the woman's death until she read it in the papers the following day.

Things would get worse for Barbara Jean Moss.

Police told Mrs. Moss they'd want to interview the 15-year-old girl who had babysat her children on the night of December 30th.

Police also now began to wonder if Barbara Jean Moss might have been involved in some of the other crimes they suspected Blattert had committed. Maybe Blattert routinely gifted stolen jewelry to Mrs. Moss?

The more police questioned Barbara Jean, the more she revealed.

On January 10, 1946, Mrs. Moss admitted that she'd been pressuring her babysitter to lie to police should they question her. The truth is her children, aged 2 and 1, had been left alone while she went to the bar with Walter Blattert. As a result of this admission, her children were removed from the home and taken into care.

Prosecutor Gerald K. O'Brien's investigation showed that Barbara Jean had harbored Blattert in her city-funded, low-cost housing apartment after the events of December 30, 1945 while having full knowledge of his crime. Mrs. Moss soon received an official notification of eviction and was told she had 30 days to relocate.

And finally, on January 11, 1946, Barbara Jean Moss was charged as an accessory after the fact in the murder of Gladys Marsden.

Barbara Jean admitted to police that she'd arranged a two night stay, Jan 3rd and 4th, 1946, at the Hotel Briggs for Walter after he had said that he "didn't want to go back to my house for fear he might be identified as Mrs. Marsden's murderer." She was released on $5000 bond.

photo from "Detroit's Historic Hotels and Restaurants" by Patricia Ibbotson

One day after Barbara Jean Moss was charged, her mother Nellene Dunbar was detained because she's admitted to being in the car when her daughter Barbara Jean disposed of the compact and watch stolen from Gladys Marsden. She too was released on bond; the amount was halved, only $2500.

It doesn't seem as though the District Attorney ever took Nellen to court on these charges. Nor do I think they ever found the items in question.

It was announced on January 7, 1946 that Walter J. Blattert would be charged with first degree murder.

His defense team leaned heavily on the fact that their client had been drinking copious amounts of alcohol during the evening and that during the fight, Gladys Marsden had aggravated an old war wound causing him to go into a blind rage.

There was additional fallout from the arrest of Blattert. Days after Blattert's arrest, Walter Migda, owner of the Southfield Tavern was in danger of losing his liquor license because both Blattert and Mrs. Moss were underage and had been served drinks all throughout the evening.

At a hearing before the state liquor license committee, bartender Stanley Grabowski testified that both of them had shown identification to prove they were over 21. However, Walter Blattert and Barbara Jean Moss testified to the contrary; they'd never been asked to show proof of age.

Mr. and Mrs. Barnes was also called to testify but they didn't know one way or the other if there was under-aged drinking that night and probably couldn't care any less. Gladys had been brutally killed, I doubt Mr. Migda's liquor license and livelihood was of any importance to them.

The Detroit Free Press announced on January 25, 1946 that Migda's license had in fact been revoked. Multiple appeals were filed but the Southfield Tavern would eventually close.

Walter Blattert's trial began on April 2, 1946 and concluded on April 4th with the jury finding the defendant guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. The jury had deliberated for 45 minutes and cast 10 ballots. Blattert did seem to tear up upon hearing the ruling but quickly gained his composure. Sentencing was scheduled for April 10, 1946.

In the courtroom to that day and throughout the proceedings was Mrs. Barbara Jean Moss, her own trial was 6 months away.

Barbara Jean, no doubt, had heard Walter say what he could during his own testimony to help her. He told the jury that Mrs. Moss had nothing to do with a planned robbery of Gladys Marsden and that it was she who encouraged him to turn himself in not his brother Charles.

Walter J. Blattert was sentenced to 14 -15 years in prison, the maximum.

I can't imagine this sat well with Tearle Wofford. It had taken Tearle four and one-half days to drive from San Diego to Detroit after being notified of his mother's murder. When he arrived, he was asked what he thought would be an appropriate punishment, Tearle told the Detroit Free Press "If I could mete out the justice that is deserving, I'd torture him a week before I let him die."

On April 12, 1946, Samuel Jackson plead guilty to larceny in connection to the robbery of Mrs. Astrein. Judge Paul E. Krause sentenced him to 4 years probation.

On October 10, 1946, Barbara Jean Moss was found guilty of accessory after the fact in the murder of Gladys Marsden. She did not take the stand and the defense called not a single witness. The maximum penalty would be five years in prison.

She wept hysterically as the verdict was read which prompted Judge Paul Krause to remind her "There's no use in crying now Barbara. It's all over now."

Less than two weeks later, on October 23, 1946, Barbara Jean Moss was sentenced to serve nine months to 15 years in the Detroit House of Corrections.

On June 25, 1947, Barbara Jean's husband Eugene Moss filed for divorce. Eugene charged Barbara Jean with infidelity and named Walter J. Blattert in the suit. Eugene asked for an immediate hearing in the matter so that he could re-enlist in the Marines. The divorce was granted in 1948.

I'm not sure when Barbara Jean Moss was released from prison but on August 20, 1948 in Dade County, Florida, she married John W. Donaldson. Thirty years later they would divorce. Barbara died at the age of 61, on October 16, 1987, in Tallahassee, leaving behind her 2 sons and a daughter by her second husband.

Not that we can know what Barbara Jean's relationship with her two sons was like after that dark time in her life but it's worth mentioning that when her eldest son Eugene died in 1996, his last name was officially Cubitt and he was a Foster Care Review Board member. Her youngest son Louis bears the last name Donaldson, so he might have been adopted by Barbara Jean's second husband John.


Walter J. Blattert was granted parole on August 20, 1954, despite a vehement protest from his trial judge John P. Scallen. He'd served less than 8 1/2 years.

In a letter to the parole board, Judge John P. Scallen wrote "The facts and circumstances in this case I recall vividly, as it was perhaps the most inhuman and savage killing that I have tried in my 24 years on the Recorder's Court bench."

Judge Scallen further wrote that he'd consulted with Ralph Garber, the assistance prosecutor who originally handled the case, and with members of the Police Bureau and "they concur wholeheartedly that Blattert should not be loosed upon society."

Blattert was considered a free man once his parole ended on February 9, 1957.

On July 4, 1957, Walter Blattert was arrested when police caught him climbing down from the roof of Nicolo's Cocktail Lounge at 13313 Harper Avenue in Detroit. Police suspected him of breaking and entering and detained him. I can find nothing further on this investigation so I have to assume Walter was released rather than charged with a crime.

Walter J. Blattert died from a sudden heart attack on June 23, 1990, in Warren, Michigan. He was 61-years-old.

The money I spent on Walter's death certificate was worth it. From that one document I learned not only his cause of death and that he was cremated but that Walter was married when he died.

I wasn't able to find a marriage record for Walter, not before or even after learning his wife's name, however I've since discovered that his wife Geneva Peck registered a name change with the Social Security Administration in March 1963, so that narrows it down a little.

Geneva Peck actually filed four name changes with Social Security. The first change was after her 1944 marriage to Paul Oliver, then again in 1958 (Dorton), 1959 (Pastor) and finally in 1963 (Blattert) after she married Walter.

The December 1991 obituary for Geneva Blattert lists her deceased husband Walter, a deceased daughter named Pauline Tuttle, a living sister.

I learned something surprising while researching this story. There is no comprehensive list or database of Purple Heart recipients. Any of the lists available online have been compiled by volunteers and the information is constantly being updated. I did not find Walter J. Blattert in the National Purple Heart Hall of Honor.

findagrave - Dee G.

Gladys Marsden's son Tearle was only 29-years-old when he died on September 8, 1953. A second daughter born to Tearle and Mary Wofford, whom they named Deborah Ann, died in 1953, she was only18 months old.

I see from Tearle's headstone that he served in not only WWII but Korea. He is buried in the Sacramento Valley National Cemetery in Dixon, California.

Gladys Marsden is buried in section 20 of the Grand Lawn Cemetery in Detroit, Michigan.

For those interested in such things - The Ruddiman Middle School, built in 1922, was closed in 2009. It's now abandoned, making it a natural destination for graffiti artists, firebugs and urban explorers.

On Sunday, November 10, 2013, at 2:30 PM, police received an anonymous tip thru Crimestoppers about a dead body in the building. The corpse was burned beyond recognition and missing its head.

Mary Mazur, spokeswoman for the Wayne County Medical Examiners office, made a statement to the press about plans to work with a forensic pathologist but seven years later, the deceased is still a John Doe and the case is unsolved.

For an unofficial tour of the building, Ruin Road has a video up on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ktntj1MmHc&t=80s

Cricket Coogler (1930-1949)

El Paso Times photo -
April 6, 1951

It's been 70 years since the barely concealed body of 18-year-old Las Cruces, New Mexico waitress Ovida "Cricket" Coogler was discovered in a shallow grave.

Despite numerous suspects and multiple witnesses to her movements on the night she was last seen alive, sixteen days before her body was found, the case has never been solved. The coroner can't even say for certain how she died. There was no autopsy and a bag of lyme was dumped on the body prior to its burial.

Popular opinion is that the police and top-ranking politicians of the day wanted to close the case but they didn't really want the right man to go to prison.

Police twice arrested NFL star player Jerry Nuzum but the good citizens of New Mexico refused to convict; they felt Nuzum was being railroaded.

Santa Fe New Mexican
photo - July 10, 1950

Police drove Wesley Eugene Byrd out into the desert and attempted to force a confession out of him but he refused to admit to a crime he said he didn't commit.

Who killed Cricket Coogler and why? Were investigators inexperienced, incompetent or purposely obstructing justice to cover up for their cronies?

This case is filled intrigue, corruption, mafia ties and honest citizens being stonewalled.

Rather than delve deep into the crime myself, as I had originally intended, I'm going to recommend the work of two others.

If you only want to spend 85 minutes on the case - I suggest watching the 2000 award-winning documentary "The Silence of Cricket Coogler: A Political Murder" by Charlie Cullin.

It's available on Vimeo, for purchase or rental.

I've uploaded the trailer to this blog's YouTube channel. https://youtu.be/S-Z2LTK0wuY

My only complaint about the documentary is that background on the victim is sparse. The focus is primarily on the kick-ass Grand Jury that was convened to look into why the sheriff's department would be doing such a lousy job investigating the homicide plus the corruption which jury members worked hard to uncover and the impact this pursuit of justice had on several of the major players. The best thing about the film might be, in my opinion, the interviews with folks who were involved in the reporting of the events and a few surviving members of the grand jury.

If it's a more comprehensive look at the case you're interested in, then pick up a copy of Paula Moore's work "Cricket in the Web."

from the As Close to Crime library

This 2008 book is well-researched and the author does what I would do myself if I was relating this crime to you - she makes a point of tracking the movements of the key players after the excitement of the trials had died down. There are plenty of suspects and many conflicting witness statements. Moore tries to sort through the evidence.

Neither Cullin nor Moore actually accuse any one individual of killing Cricket Coogler, either because they don't know or they don't wish to be sued.

I, naturally, recommend both the film and the book as a set piece. The documentary, including it's unused footage, was a resource for author Paula Moore.

Junior E-Man

444 N. Duke Street, Lancaster PA
Bing Maps

On December 28, 1932, a letter addressed to Mrs. C.E. Long was dropped through the mail slot at her home - 444 North Duke Street, Lancaster, Pa. Her maid, Mrs. Charlotte Stewart, found it.

The enclosed hand-written note read:

"Dear Madam, Mrs. C.E. Long.

I am warning you to give me the $500 right away. If you got my other note you would have put it at the bottom of the steps where the old railroad station was I mean the steps on Duke St. and Chestnut St. by Jan. 7, 1933 on Saturday from 7:00 o'clock to 10:00.

Signed the

RED HAND & BLACK FLESH 

GANG

 THE MONEY AT ONCE"

Mrs. Caroline Long wondered "What other note?" "Why would I give anyone $500?" "Who's this Red Hand & Black Flesh Gang?"

Caroline Long, was an intelligent, 62-year-old active society woman and widow of tobacco merchant Charles Emory Long. She called the police - she recognized extortion when she saw it.

Intelligencer Journal -
June 23, 1944 photo

Lancaster New Era -
Nov 3, 1930 photo

Detectives Daniel Shaub and James Crawford were assigned to the case. 

The detectives prepared a dummy package, wrapping old newspapers to resemble a bundle of money. Since the extortionists failed to specify 7 AM or 7 PM, they instructed Mrs. Long to place it under the wooden steps leading from the Duke Street Bridge just north of Chestnut Street early Saturday, the 7th. 

Shaub and Crawford were prepared to wait all day, if necessary. And wait they did. Taking it in shifts, Shaub and Crawford kept a close eye on the drop spot but nobody came to claim the cash. 

Late Saturday night, they removed the package and left.

Had the Red Hand Gang noticed a police presence?

On Wednesday afternoon, January 11, 1933, Mrs. Long was contacted again. 

At 4:35 PM, Mrs. Stewart, responding to a ringing doorbell, found a young boy on roller skates standing on the front steps. He told her there was a letter in the mail slot. She retrieved the envelope and asked the boy who had sent it. He pointed to another boy, also on roller skates, standing on the corner of Duke and James Streets, a short distance away.

Mrs. Stewart walked to the corner and asked the other boy who had sent the letter. He replied that he did not know. Both boys skated away on James Street, in the direction of Queen Street.

Mrs. Stewart returned to the house and handed the envelope to Mrs. Long. The enclosed note read:

"Mrs. C.E. Long,

I have warned you twice & this is the last time. So put the $500 under the old railroad steps by 5:30 o'clock Jan. 11, & don't tell the cops or there will be trouble for you what I mean trouble & don't forget Jan. 11, the $500.

THE RED HAND GANG."

Detective John Kauffman -
 Intelligencer Journal -
May 23, 1938 photo

When word of a second demand reached the police, Detective James Crawford headed straight for the drop location while Detectives Daniel Shaub and John Kauffman spoke with the two women.

Another dummy package was prepared and given to Mrs. Long for placement under the wooden steps. They had to act quickly - the Gang was expecting the money within the hour.

Unlike the previous stakeout, police weren't disappointed. At 5:45 PM, two boys appeared at the Duke Street Bridge, walked down the steps, and one of them reached underneath for the package. Crawford, Shaub and Kauffman swooped in and made the arrests.

Was this the Red Hand Gang?

Thirteen-year-old Hiram Grove Beattie, Jr., residing at 1016 North Duke Street, was interviewed first and told quite the tale. 

 photo from
Intelligencer
Journal -
Jan 12, 1933

Hiram said he had been approached by some men in a car bearing Ohio license plates. The men had forced Hiram to copy, in his own hand, the ransom note then deliver it to Mrs. Long's house. He was instructed to pick up the parcel beneath the stairs and take it to the corner of Lemon and Queen Streets, where the men would be waiting.

The other boy, aged 12, seemed to know nothing of these plans.

A few hours later, the detectives had another crack at Hiram. Defeated, he admitted that he had written both of the letters to Mrs. Long.

Hiram didn't actually know Mrs. Long, he had simply picked her name out of the phone book. Hiram told police he had delivered the first note himself but asked a friend to deliver the second one while he stood a distance away and watched. 

The reference to a previous demand being sent was a fabrication. The letter delivered on December 28th was his first attempt to get money from Mrs. Long.

Hiram remained adamant that his friend, who remains unnamed to this day, was not involved in the extortion scheme and that he had no idea what Hiram was up to. That boy was released from custody.

When asked why he hadn't picked up the money on Saturday, January 7th, Hiram admitted that he couldn't because he'd been grounded and his parents had forbidden him to leave the house.

When asked why he'd attempted to extort money from Mrs. Long, Hiram said he wanted the money "to save until summer so I can go camping in Maryland after school is out."

Hiram Beattie was taken from Police Headquarters and committed to The Rotary Home for Boys. The case would be tried in Juvenile Court. Police also announced their intention to question Hiram in connection to a series of mysterious telephone calls received by locals within the last 10 days. These calls were of a threatening nature. One business man was warned that he "will be bumped off on Friday the 13th."

Hiram's case was tried in Juvenile Court so the proceedings were conducted behind closed doors and the records sealed. It was believed that he would be sent to Glen Mills, a reform school for boys. 

Hiram didn't say why he signed the notes "The Red Hand Gang" but I like to think it was from a "Seckatary Hawkins" story written by Robert F. Schulkers and serialized in newspapers during November of 1932.

Seckatary.com image

(If Seckatary Hawkins sounds familiar to you, that might be because Harper Lee was a big fan and two of Schulkers' books featuring this character are referenced in "To Kill a Mockingbird.")

Seckatary.com image

Despite being only 13-years-old, Hiram was not unknown to police. He first came to their attention on February 3, 1930 when he stabbed his fourth grade teacher, Miss Dorothy V. Wiley. He was nine-years-old at the time.

How did Hiram explain his actions? "The studies are too hard, and when I wouldn't do my lessons she beat me. This morning we had a test in arithmetic but I couldn't do the questions. It was too hard. She's always beating me."

Rockland Street School Principal Alfred G. Thomas backed up Hiram's take on things. 

Mr. Thomas is quoted as saying, "We have been using discipline with young Beattie for some time. He could be bright in his studies if he wished to apply himself, but he is of a stubborn and contrary disposition. We asked his parents to cooperate with us, but he has shown no improvement.  This morning Miss Wiley remonstrated with him for not making an effort during an arithmetic test, and he stabbed her."

 A sobbing Hiram countered with, "What if I did stab her? She hit me, didn't she?"

This wasn't an isolated incident, however. Staff members had previously relieved Hiram of a pistol and bread knife.

Hiram explained, "The revolver they talk about was empty. I just wanted to show it to the fellows at school. The bread knife was a plaything. I never intended to hurt anyone."

Anna Lenhardt -
photo from
Lancaster Sunday News,
Feb 21, 1926

The knife used to stab Miss Wiley was given to Hiram by 13-year-old Kermit Rishell, who told police he had found the knife in a downtown store. On February 9, 1933, the same Kermit Rishell was arrested for breaking into and looting a paint shop. This latest arrest was his fourth offense.

On February 3rd, at 10 AM, when the schoolwork proved too hard for Hiram, Miss Wiley slapped him on the back with the palm of her hand. Hiram attempted to leave the room but Miss Wiley beat him to the door and refused to move so Hiram pulled out a knife which had a three inch blade and stabbed her in the left upper arm, a few inches above the elbow. Miss Wiley stood her ground until help arrived. 

 Intelligencer 
Journal -
Feb 23, 1933 photo

Hiram was detained by Principal Thomas while the police were called. The gash in Miss Wiley's arm was treated by nurse Anna Lenhardt.

Policeman Ivan Steffy took Hiram to police headquarters where he was detained pending an investigation.

Lancaster New Era -
June 6, 1929 photo

Detective William Sullenberger took charge of the case.

School officials quickly investigated the matter and school superintendent H.E. Gress announced Miss Wiley "was doing her duty when she remonstrated young Beattie for his failure to study" and he felt she was deserving of praise for her bravery "in the face of danger" at the time she was stabbed.

They agreed not to press criminal charges against Hiram but made it clear that he would not be allowed to return to the school; he was released into the custody of his mother, Mary Beattie, who promised to administer discipline in her own way.

(Author's note - before learning of Hiram's extortion attempt, I was inclined to call this blog entry "Math is Hard.")

On June 27, 1930, young Hiram was running around a street car and smacked into the rear end of a moving car. He was knocked to the ground. Doctors at Lancaster's General Hospital treated the boy for lacerations to his head and right shoulder. The accident was witnessed by is father, Hiram Sr. who was a passenger on the street car.

Six months after stabbing Miss Wiley, on August 20, 1930, Hiram was picked up by police for stealing a bicycle from the garage of Mrs. B.E. Oliver, 20 North Broad Street. The bicycle was later abandoned in Quarryville, PA and Beattie hitch-hiked home. For that crime he was dismissed after being reprimanded.

According to SSDI records, some time after 1937, Hiram Grove Beattie, Jr. changed his named to Horace Grove Beattie.

On January 28, 1942, Hiram G. Beattie, now living in Massachusetts with his mother, enlisted in the US Army. He served until October 12, 1945.

clipping from the Lancaster New Era -
August 28, 1942

Hiram aka Horace Beattie would marry 3 or possibly 4 times.

I can see a record of a Horace G. Beattie marrying in 1945 but no other details are known to me. The Massachusetts Marriage Index isn't exactly chock-full of particulars so there's no way to be certain it's the same person.

Catherine Beattie nee' Hammond was identified as Horace's second wife by newspapers when she had him arrested in 1950 ... not once but twice. The first time was for driving her car without her permission and then two months later for non-support. The latter being a felony in the state of Massachusetts. Catherine dropped the lesser charge after Horace was extradited back to Massachusetts. I believe Catherine was the woman Horace married in 1945.

Horace's 1942 enlistment records indicate he is "Divorced, without dependents."

When Horace married Erla Doerr on December 1 1952, in the state of New Hampshire despite both being residents of Massachusetts, Horace indicated this was to be his second marriage. As it was for her too.

Horace's last wife was Marion Ann Beattie nee' Heil. According to Marion's obituary, she and Horace married on December 11, 1963 in Rockford, Illinois.

Horace died on October 11, 2003. His wife Marion died October 30, 2014.

Horace's own parents, Hiram G. Beattie, Sr and Mary Eve Shay Beattie nee' Shay, would also dissolve their union. In January 1943, Hiram Sr., still living in Lancaster, PA filed for divorce from his wife on grounds of desertion. She was living in Brighton, Massachusetts. They were married on November 5, 1919, separated since April 6, 1941 and they
officially divorced in early August 1943.

Mary Eve Beattie died on July 22, 1980. Hiram G. Beattie, Sr. died on March 1, 1981.

Horace's younger brother Edwin Dunbar Beattie died in 1989. Horace's sister, Mary Elizabeth Beattie Spering died in 2005. Mary's December 19, 2005 obituary confirms Hiram's name change and also one for brother Edwin who preferred to be called Edward.

photo accompanying
her obituary

Stabbing victim Miss Dorothy Wiley married Kenneth Simpson on June 18, 1938 and continued teaching until retiring in 1970. She died on November 30, 1984 when she was 77-years-old.  Dorothy's husband Kenneth died August 23, 1989, at the age of 81.

The Long Grave
findagrave photo
uploaded by
Donna Butler Sheaffer

Mrs. Caroline Long died on January 20, 1941 at the age of 70. Cause of death was coronary thrombosis. She's buried alongside her husband Charles Emory Long (1870-1927) in Lancaster's Greenwood Cemetery.

Tragically, Roy Steffy, 24-year-old son of retired Police Officer Ivan Steffy and Korean War veteran, used his father's service revolver to kill himself just 6 weeks after being discharged from the Army. Early in the morning of November 13, 1951, Ivan heard the gunshot, ran down to the kitchen and found his son lying on the kitchen floor - dead from a single gunshot wound to the right side of his head. Ivan Steffy retired from the Lancaster Police Department in 1947 and died in 1984, at the age of 90.

Detective Daniel Shaub retired from the Lancaster Police Department in 1940  and died in 1978.

Detective William Sullenberger retired from the Lancaster Police Department in 1944 and died in 1979.

 Lancaster New Era -
Oct 6, 1961 photo

Kermit Rishell, the young boy who gave Hiram the knife used to stab Miss Wiley, landed in hot water again in 1961 for helping out a friend. Kermit was one of three Lancaster City employees who paved a coworker's driveway while on the clock, using city materials and equipment. Charles T. Grab, owner of the driveway, was ordered to pay the city $23.03, the estimated cost of the work, and Kermit lost a day's pay. There was some discussion as to whether or not Grab was entitled to have the city pay for the repair to his driveway as Grab had previously parked a city truck in his garage and the truck had damaged his driveway. Kermit died suddenly on February 13, 1962.

Because of Hiram's earlier and later bad behavior, I was initially doubtful of a story he and his friends had told police in June of 1930. Sadly, there is truth in this.

On June 29, 1930, Hiram along with his younger brother Edwin and 2 other boys, all ranging in ages from 8 to 10-years old, were lured into the car of 48-year-old Charles Davidson. Davidson drove the boys to behind the Lancaster Almshouse where he "criminally assaulted" them. Nothing more specific was reported in newspapers but clearly the assault was sexual in nature. An article in the June 30, 1930 edition of the Intelligencer Journal, hints at it being an attempted rape.

Intelligencer Journal -
June 27, 1928 photo

The boys reported the incident to their parents, who then
called the police. Officer William Jenkins arrested Davidson the following day. All four boys positively identified Davidson as the man who assaulted them. Davidson who when arrested had given his address as 401 North Queen Street actually lived at 433 North Queen Street.

On July 28, 1930, the Intelligencer Journal reported that Davidson "pleaded guilty to a serious charge." He was fined $50 and received a 6 month sentence.

The Home for Friendless Children,
on the occasion of it being razed
to the ground to make room
for the Garden Court Apartments -
Lancaster New Era photo
from Dec 13, 1966

If you think that's a pretty light sentence considering the crime, it's even worse when you learn that Charles Davidson was actually Samuel Davidson - a man who had spent 11 years in prison for the attempted rape of two young girls residing at the aptly-named Home for Friendless Children, located on the corner of South Ann Street and Chester Avenue.

On Friday, April 17, 1908, at 1:30 AM, Samuel Davidson gained entry into the children's home then made his way to the third floor and crept into the girls' dormitory. One of the youngsters awoke, prepared to cry out at the sight of this strange man in her room, but Samuel told her not to worry because he was a doctor. He then asked where the biggest of the girls slept.

That girl was one bed over and when she heard the voices, she ran into a small adjoining room. Samuel quickly caught her, told her not to make a sound; he tried to appease her with the lie that he was a doctor. Well, she didn't want to play doctor with Samuel. She slipped from his grasp and made her escape. Back in the dorm, everyone was waking up and two of the girls ran to fetch the female attendant. The cry of "There's a man in the house" went out and so did Samuel. He escaped the same way he came in.

Intelligencer Journal
photo - Jan 16, 1920

The matter was reported to the police Saturday night. The description of the intruder matched that of Samuel Davidson, who had been seen near the Home for Friendless Children by Chief of Police Walter G. Bushong around midnight of the night of the crime. Davidson had a previous arrest (January 1907) for public lewdness in the presence of school children.

A warrant for Davidson's arrest was issued and at 1 o'clock Sunday morning, April 19, 1908, Samuel Davidson was apprehended and charged with felonious entry and assault, with the intent to commit rape.

As Davidson was being taken out of the patrol wagon he dropped a silver watch, but the officers had seen this slight of hand. The watch was recovered and police later learned that H.C. Gingrich had been robbed while dozing in the waiting room of the Franklin House, a hotel located on North Queen Street, at around 11:30 PM Saturday. Taken from Gingrich, as he slept, was the silver watch and $21 in cash. Gingrich identified the watch as his property. As for the cash, Davidson had only $3.00 on him when arrested.

On Monday morning, police escorted Davidson back to the Children's Home where he was positively identified by the children. Davidson decided to plead guilty to the theft and felonious entry but refused to admit to the assault. Davidson conceded that he was under the influence of alcohol when he entered the Home but he had no recollection of touching the girls.

The court sentenced him to one year in prison for the robbery plus he was to pay a fine of $100.00,  for the other offenses Davidson was fined of $500 and ordered to spend 10 years in prison. That prison being the Eastern State Penitentiary. The sentences were to run consecutively.

Easter State Penitentiary in Philadelphia, PA

April 22, 1908 was big day for the Home for Friendless Children. The man who had terrorized them 5 nights prior would be put away and a grand jury also recommended that the children be given butter at all their meals and that springs be placed in the their beds.

Samuel Davidson was released from prison on April 22, 1915. Hours later he was spending his prison earnings, $170.00, on wine, women and song. Davidson drank so much that he passed out and when he woke up his money and new-found his friends were gone. Police arrested Emma Barrett, Marie Davis and Helen Narthy. They were held for a hearing.

Samuel Davidson would be arrested multiple times for crimes ranging from forgery, larceny, surety of the peace and most notably a public lewdness charge on April 22, 1931 that netted him a year in prison.

The children of Lancaster breathed a sigh of relief when on October 5, 1932, Samuel Davidson had an on the job injury which cost him his life.

Davidson, working as a steeplejack, was painting the 60 foot tall flagpole in front of the Franklin and Marshall Academy building. He was seated on scaffold, suspended 30 feet above the ground and not utilizing a safety hitch. The rope supporting the scaffold tore and Davidson plummeted to the ground. An ambulance transported the unconscious man to the General Hospital. Cause of death was attributed to internal injuries and a skull fracture.

Detective Daniel Shaub attempted to locate Davidson's family but finding no one to claim the body, Davidson was buried in a Potter's Field.

Officer William Jenkins, who had arrested Samuel Davidson in 1930 for his crimes against the Beattie boys and two of their friends, retired from the Lancaster Police Department in 1942 on a disability pension. He died in 1969, when he was 75-years-old.

Walter Grant Bushong, who was Lancaster's Chief of Police from 1904-1921, died on November 23, 1936 following a stroke. He was 63-years-old.