Why are you here and why am I doing this?

Why are you here and why am I doing this?

If you're like me, THIS is as close to crime as you want to get.

You want to maintain a safe distance and delve into it when it's convenient for you; not when some lunatic knocks on your door in the middle of the night, runs you off the road or approaches you in a parking lot.

Maybe you are a Murderino?

I'm someone who resolves every New Year's Eve to NOT be the victim of a crime.

Some of the crimes I'll describe here aren't horrific or even result in death, but they're still situations to be avoided. Who wants the drama or the paperwork associated with a non-violent crime? Not me.

I know I'm not the only one who's interested in reading about crime & criminals. I hope to use this blog to share that interest with others.

My process is to find something in an old newspaper, news broadcast or my own memory that grabs my attention and delve deep. I research the cases and people using newspaper and magazine archives, genealogy sites plus court or prison documents (when I can afford them). Lately the way I write the stories has changed. I'm starting to show the effort I've made to track down specific details. I also seem to be posting less frequently. This can be attributed to the fact that I'm now concerned with the As Close to Crime YouTube channel as well as my habit of falling deeper and deeper into rabbit holes with each new entry. I'd rather have quality than quantity, so I've come to terms with the lessening output.

I try not rely too heavily on other websites or books but I credit people when it's appropriate. In fact, if my main source of information is someone else's book, I'll just recommend the book. This was the case with "The Bobbed Haired Bandit."

Don't expect too many Top 10 lists from me. I instead prefer to select the more obscure crimes that some visitors to this blog have either never heard of or haven't thought about in awhile.

I also like to give attention to not just those who break the law but those who uphold the law. So you can expect to see some of that here.

There's a companion YouTube Channel for this blog, called As Close to Crime, where I occasionally post clips related to particular blog entries or just random clips concerning criminal activity. I'm never going to post an entire commercially available film.

Be sure to subscribe to the channel or this blog.

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Axe Murder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Axe Murder. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Bertha Boozer Took An Ax ....

Bertha Boozer took an ax and gave her husband several whacks.

Okay, so technically her name was no longer Boozer at the time of the crime but the surname "Still" was one syllable too short for the rhyme to work.

What would make Bertha Still, a 34-year-old devoted mother of seven children, kill her husband in such a brutal way?

When Vineland, NJ police responded to the call on the morning of January 5, 1971 (a Tuesday), Bertha told them that there had been a domestic dispute and prior to going to bed her husband Richard, aged 38, announced that when he woke up someone was going to die.

Not wanting to be a victim, Bertha grabbed a hatchet, entered a bedroom on the second floor of their home, delivered several deadly blows to Richard's head and groin then threw hot water on him. The water was hot enough to cause 2nd degree burns. FYI, that would mean the water was between 110 and 150 degrees.

Bertha finally called the police but nothing could be done to save Richard. He was DOA when the ambulance pulled up to Newcomb Hospital. Bertha's defense was that she beat him to the punch. One of their children was home on the first floor of the house at the time of the attack but the newspapers don't indicate which of them it was.

 photo from
The Daily Journal,
Nov 23, 1951

 As I researched this case, I became confused.

 By all accounts both Bertha and Richard came from good families. They were  active in the community and the church. Richard was gainfully employed and supporting his family. He had been a High School football star and served in the Air Force. Bertha's father was a minister and her mother was a well-respected, hard-working woman.
reprinted from
The Daily Journal,
Jan 5, 1972

Bertha's family was there in the courtroom to support her throughout the legal proceedings.

I'd found a loving tribute printed in the Vineland, NJ Daily Tribune one year after Richard's death from a family that still mourned him.

He certainly didn't seem like someone who needed killing and she didn't seem like an unstable individual.

Newspapers reporting on the murder could provide no more motive than "a domestic quarrel."

I dug deeper. There had to be more to this story.

Clearly nobody knows what goes on behind closed doors.

Bertha Still was born Bertha Mallory in 1936. She'd made a poor choice for husband number one - Charles Boozer. I couldn't find the exact wedding day but Social Security records indicate a name change in August 1954.

Charles Boozer was a year or two younger than Bertha and a career criminal with convictions for (but not restricted to) being a lookout for a dice game, petty theft, passing bad checks, reckless driving, breaking and entering, larceny, non-support and atrocious assault. Police took a good look at Charles back in 1955 when he'd run over and killed his uncle, Thomas White.

Charles was also cheating on Bertha and fathered three children with another woman, Nettie Ruth Gingham. I'm thinking, Bertha's parents couldn't have been more disappointed with their daughter's husband but they stood by her.

Nettie and Charles seem better suited to one another anyway as they were both arrested together on numerous occasions (in 1959 for disorderly conduct and withholding information from the police, in 1960 for disorderly conduct and again in 1963 for property damage). The 1960 arrest stemmed from a complaint filed by Bertha and her mother, Bertha Mallory. In 1964, Nettie also ended up suing Charles for non-support.

In September 1960, Bertha Boozer admitted to stealing $13 from her employer's home to pay for babysitters. The victims of this theft, Mr. and Mrs. Norman Hoskins, asked the judge to be merciful so Bertha received a suspended $100 fine and was placed on 6 months probation.

On March 14, 1966, Bertha charged Charles Boozer with desertion and in June 1966 she obtained a divorce. The divorce was just so much paperwork though because it seems Bertha had moved on in her life. By the time she was legally separated from Charles Boozer, Bertha had started a family with Richard Still; they had three daughters, all born before 1966 (no judgment, just fact) and the relationship seemed solid. With her first marriage behind her, Bertha and Richard were free to marry. The next Social Security name change for Bertha is September 1966. Things were looking better all the time.

But wait - what's this? A 1968 arrest for a Richard Still involving carnal abuse and sodomy? And the victim is his 13-year-old stepdaughter? I won't be naming the victim but court documents sent to me by the NJ Superior Court leave no doubt that it is in fact the very same Richard F. Still, husband of Bertha. Now we have sufficient motive.

On December 2, 1968, Richard entered a plea of not guilty and waited a little over three months for his day in court. The trial lasted 4 days. On March 13, 1969, the verdict was read. Guilty on both counts.

I'll transcribe the sentencing directly from the paperwork: "1st count (rape), defendant committed to county jail for 6 months, suspended providing a fine of $500 is paid to Probation Dept. within 30 days. 2nd count (sodomy), defendant committed to County Jail for 6 months, suspended. This sentence to run concurrently with sentence of the 1st count of this indictment."

You may recall, Bertha had once received a 6 month suspended sentence ... for stealing $13.

My husband has theorized, perhaps correctly, that the reason Richard served no jail time is he might have been the major source of income for the family. Richard certainly didn't lose his job as a result of the conviction because when he was killed in 1971, Richard was still employed by Shieldalloy Corp as a forklift operator; a job, according to his obituary, he had held for the last 10 years.

Bertha Still was arrested on January 5, 1971 and held in prison until February 12, 1971 when she was freed on $10,000 bail. She had initially entered a plea of not guilty but changed that to "no defense" on May 28, 1971. The sentence that was handed down on June 18, 1971 was 12 to 13 months in Clinton Reformatory.

I'm not sure when Bertha was released but she was already applying for parole 2 months into her sentence and it was predicted she would not serve the entire 13 months. I see by August 10, 1973, Bertha was out of prison and working as the Committee Secretary for the Vineland Citizens Club.

photo from Lisa's
obituary in
The Daily Journal,
June 15, 1974 

More sadness awaited Bertha and her family though.

On June 13, 1974, Bertha and Richard's youngest daughter Lisa was killed by a passing automobile as she stepped off the school bus. She was only 11-years-old.

Lincoln Memorial Park,
Mays Landing, NJ -
photo uploaded to FindaGrave.com
by Dennis Kolb, Jr
Bertha Still died on April 5, 1995. She was not buried beside her husband.

Friday, April 13, 2018

Too Proud or Too Crazy?

It wasn't uncommon for Gladys Quackenbush to have her name printed in the local newspapers. It was the fashion back in the day to announce whenever a young woman was off visiting relatives or attending some social function. But nobody was prepared for the story that would be appear in almost every newspaper on May 26, 1925. Sadly, it would soon became evident that the good folks at the New Jersey State Hospital for the Insane should have seen it coming.


In the early morning hours of May 26, 1925, Gladys, aged 28, had been killed in her sleep. Hacked to death with 14 blows of an axe. The killer was Aretta Quackenbush, her 65-year-old mother.


Aretta had been deemed "suicidal" and institutionalized since February 26, 1925 after she'd tried to take her own life; she'd been released from the NJ State Hospital for the Insane only a week before.


New Jersey State Hospital for the Insane

Neighbors had heard some arguing and raised voices coming from the  Quackenbush home in Tennent, NJ on the night of May 25, 1926. Aretta and Gladys often argued, mostly about money. Aretta's husband Holmes had died in 1904 and left them an inheritance but, it is believed Aretta lost most of the money due to "rash speculation" and the stress over their dwindling financial condition had affected her mind. By this time they were "practically penniless." Neither woman had a job and Aretta's pride got in the way whenever Gladys offered to seek employment. Gladys had made arrangements to leave the family home and relocate to Freehold, NJ to serve as a kind of live-in housekeeper. This might have been the last straw.

A neighbor, John Turneau, heard subdued crying as he walked by the Quackenbush home at 6:35 AM while on his way to work. He was worried, not enough to knock on the door although he did mention it to his supervisor. Another neighbor, Miss Laura Bennett, was walking past the Quackenbush home one hour later when Aretta opened the front door and called out "Laura, call Dr. Applegate. I've killed Gladys."

Laura didn't phone the police, remember this is 1925, but instead stopped in at another neighbor's house - one belonging to the Whalen family. Arthur Whalen, aged 20, offered to go over and investigate. He knocked at the door several times but received no reply until he finally heard a voice asking "Is that you Laura? You can't come in." Arthur walked around the house until he could peek through a window. Arthur saw Aretta in blood-stained clothes, she was mumbling "Oh, my God" over and over again. Arthur returned home then telephoned the State Police.

NJ State Trooper James McCormick
Trooper James McCormick responded to the call in civilian clothes. He saw Aretta walking back towards her own home from the Whalen house. She'd gone over there for a pail of water but had been refused entry. Can't say I blame them. Aretta was uncooperative at first, until she saw his Police badge then she allowed Trooper McCormick to enter her home and it was there he discovered the body of Gladys and blood splatter everywhere. Gladys is described as being "unrecognizable" due to the severe blows to her head. Any one of which would have been sufficient to kill her.


Aretta had injuries of her own. Her eyes were swollen nearly shut and there was blood on her forehead. Aretta claimed Gladys had attacked her the night before with a hammer so her killing Gladys was either "self-defense" or "revenge." Authorities believe that Aretta's wounds were self-inflicted. She readily admitted what she had done and told investigators, "It was all over in five minutes." During the car ride to the Police HQ, Aretta  tried to jump from the moving car but was held back.

Given Aretta's recent hospital stay and her actions on the morning of the killing, she was quite easily declared insane and incapable of even assisting in her own defense. She was remanded, once again, to the New Jersey State Hospital for the Insane. I don't believe she was ever released. Aretta is listed as an inmate of the Hospital in the 1940 Census and she died on December 18, 1943. Both Gladys and Aretta are buried in the Old Tennant Churchyard in Manalapan, NJ. The family farm, home and personal property were sold after Aretta was committed and the proceeds were used to pay for her care at the Hospital.

There was much finger-pointing after the fact and, of course, promises from the Hospital to do a better job so that this kind of tragedy could be avoided in future. Dr. Carl Pierson testified that he knew Aretta had attempted to take her own life three months prior but that was all. Judge Lawrence who headed the three person lunacy committee charged with investigating the incident, produced documentation from when Aretta was admitted in February which recorded the fact that she had also threatened the life of her daughter. The eminent Dr. Henry Cotton felt comfortable blaming Aretta's relations, and that included the victim, who had agreed to Aretta's release. I'd also like to note that Dr. Cotton is the only one who refers, numerous times, to Gladys as being "feeble-minded." If Gladys was feeble-minded, why would the hospital consider her capable of caring for Aretta? 
Dr. Henry Cotton
Dr. Cotton would have to get used to being on the defensive. Not only in this matter but for his methods in general. Dr. Cotton strongly believed there was a definite connection between insanity and infection in the body. He and his staff of surgeons would routinely perform operations on the patients, often times it seems without their consent. It was common practice to remove any organs they suspected to be harboring infection, also the patients' teeth. The staff also performed sterilization procedures on the patients. Any surgery was a risk, especially when there were no antibiotics then and a real danger of post-operative infection. There might have been a high mortality rate as a result of these procedures but the patients would be considered sane when they expired.  Naturally, not everyone considered Dr. Cotton a monster. He did actually believe in treating the patients more humanely.